4.8 Article

Induction of cross-neutralizing antibodies by a permuted hepatitis C virus glycoprotein nanoparticle vaccine candidate

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-34961-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fondation Dormeur, Vaduz
  2. AMC Fellowship from Amsterdam UMC
  3. Vici grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)
  4. NWO [91719372, 015.015.042]
  5. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1156262]
  6. Amsterdam institute for Infection and Immunity Postdoctoral grant
  7. AMC PhD Scholarship
  8. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [INV-008352/OPP1153692]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study describes the generation of recombinant soluble E1E2 immunogens, which are displayed on nanoparticles and induce potent neutralizing antibody responses. Furthermore, mosaic nanoparticles displaying multiple different E2E1 immunogens significantly improve neutralization.
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection affects approximately 58 million people and causes similar to 300,000 deaths yearly. The only target for HCV neutralizing antibodies is the highly sequence diverse E1E2 glycoprotein. Eliciting broadly neutralizing antibodies that recognize conserved cross-neutralizing epitopes is important for an effective HCV vaccine. However, most recombinant HCV glycoprotein vaccines, which usually include only E2, induce only weak neutralizing antibody responses. Here, we describe recombinant soluble E1E2 immunogens that were generated by permutation of the E1 and E2 subunits. We displayed the E2E1 immunogens on two-component nanoparticles and these nanoparticles induce significantly more potent neutralizing antibody responses than E2. Next, we generated mosaic nanoparticles co-displaying six different E2E1 immunogens. These mosaic E2E1 nanoparticles elicit significantly improved neutralization compared to monovalent E2E1 nanoparticles. These results provide a roadmap for the generation of an HCV vaccine that induces potent and broad neutralization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据