4.8 Article

Directing Min protein patterns with advective bulk flow

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-35997-0

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Meindlhumer et al. have conducted a combined theoretical and experimental study on how the propagation direction of Min protein patterns can be changed by a bulk flow of solution. They demonstrate that the direction of in vitro Min protein patterns can be controlled by hydrodynamic flow, with downstream propagation for low concentration ratios of MinE:MinD, upstream propagation for large ratios, and multistability in between. Their study reveals the potential of using flow to probe molecular features and constrain mathematical models for pattern formation systems.
Meindlhumer et al. report a combined theoretical/experimental study of how the propagation direction of Min protein patterns can be altered by a bulk flow of solution. The Min proteins constitute the best-studied model system for pattern formation in cell biology. We theoretically predict and experimentally show that the propagation direction of in vitro Min protein patterns can be controlled by a hydrodynamic flow of the bulk solution. We find downstream propagation of Min wave patterns for low MinE:MinD concentration ratios, upstream propagation for large ratios, but multistability of both propagation directions in between. Whereas downstream propagation can be described by a minimal model that disregards MinE conformational switching, upstream propagation can be reproduced by a reduced switch model, where increased MinD bulk concentrations on the upstream side promote protein attachment. Our study demonstrates that a differential flow, where bulk flow advects protein concentrations in the bulk, but not on the surface, can control surface-pattern propagation. This suggests that flow can be used to probe molecular features and to constrain mathematical models for pattern-forming systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据