4.8 Article

A soft and ultrasensitive force sensing diaphragm for probing cardiac organoids instantaneously and wirelessly

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-34860-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. Discovery Projects funding scheme [DP200100624]
  2. NHMRC [APP2010154]
  3. Jack Brockhoff foundation (JBF) [4659-2019]
  4. St Vincent's Hospital (Melbourne) Research Endowment Fund
  5. Stafford Fox Medical Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a method using a soft resistive force-sensing diaphragm to monitor the contraction forces and beating patterns of cardiac organoids in real-time. The method overcomes the mismatch between the topological complexity and soft tissue properties of organoids and rigid force sensors, providing a new approach for studying the mechanical properties of cardiac tissues.
Time-lapse mechanical properties of stem cell derived cardiac organoids are important biological cues for understanding contraction dynamics of human heart tissues, cardiovascular functions and diseases. However, it remains difficult to directly, instantaneously and accurately characterize such mechanical properties in real-time and in situ because cardiac organoids are topologically complex, three-dimensional soft tissues suspended in biological media, which creates a mismatch in mechanics and topology with state-of-the-art force sensors that are typically rigid, planar and bulky. Here, we present a soft resistive force-sensing diaphragm based on ultrasensitive resistive nanocracked platinum film, which can be integrated into an all-soft culture well via an oxygen plasma-enabled bonding process. We show that a reliable organoid-diaphragm contact can be established by an 'Atomic Force Microscope-like' engaging process. This allows for instantaneous detection of the organoids' minute contractile forces and beating patterns during electrical stimulation, resuscitation, drug dosing, tissue culture, and disease modelling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据