4.8 Article

Structural basis for the activation of the lipid scramblase TMEM16F

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-34497-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) [339116]
  2. Center for Microscopy and Image Analysis (ZMB) of the University of Zurich
  3. Baugarten foundation
  4. Schwyzer-Winiker foundation
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation
  6. European Research Council (ERC) [339116] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By studying the structure and function of TMEM16F mutants, the authors uncover how this protein is activated by an increase in intracellular Ca2+ to initiate blood coagulation and trophoblast fusion, providing valuable insights for drug target development.
TMEM16F, a member of the conserved TMEM16 family, plays a central role in the initiation of blood coagulation and the fusion of trophoblasts. The protein mediates passive ion and lipid transport in response to an increase in intracellular Ca2+. However, the mechanism of how the protein facilitates both processes has remained elusive. Here we investigate the basis for TMEM16F activation. In a screen of residues lining the proposed site of conduction, we identify mutants with strongly activating phenotype. Structures of these mutants determined herein by cryo-electron microscopy show major rearrangements leading to the exposure of hydrophilic patches to the membrane, whose distortion facilitates lipid diffusion. The concomitant opening of a pore promotes ion conduction in the same protein conformation. Our work has revealed a mechanism that is distinct for this branch of the family and that will aid the development of a specific pharmacology for a promising drug target. TMEM16F is a dual ion channel and lipid scramblase that is involved in blood coagulation and cell fusion. Here, authors elucidate how the protein is activated by Ca2+ to accomplish both functions in a single protein conformation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据