4.8 Article

A comprehensive update to the Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv reference genome

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-34853-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [U19AI11276, U19AI162598]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R00-GM118907, R01-AI146198]
  3. Agilent Early Career Professor Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a pipeline called Bact-Builder, which uses consensus building to generate accurate bacterial genome sequences. The pipeline was applied to the H37Rv strain and identified new regions and polymorphisms in the genome. The results suggest that Bact-Builder is an improved method for de novo assembly of bacterial genomes.
H37Rv is the most widely used Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain, and its genome is globally used as the M. tuberculosis reference sequence. Here, we present Bact-Builder, a pipeline that uses consensus building to generate complete and accurate bacterial genome sequences and apply it to three independently cultured and sequenced H37Rv aliquots of a single laboratory stock. Two of the 4,417,942 base-pair long H37Rv assemblies are 100% identical, with the third differing by a single nucleotide. Compared to the existing H37Rv reference, the new sequence contains similar to 6.4 kb additional base pairs, encoding ten new regions that include insertions in PE/PPE genes and new paralogs of esxN and esxJ, which are differentially expressed compared to the reference genes. New sequencing and de novo assemblies with Bact-Builder confirm that all 10 regions, plus small additional polymorphisms, are also present in the commonly used H37Rv strains NR123, TMC102, and H37Rv1998. Thus, Bact-Builder shows promise as an improved method to perform accurate and reproducible de novo assemblies of bacterial genomes, and our work provides important updates to the primary M. tuberculosis reference genome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据