4.3 Article

Who's afraid of the X? Incorporating the X and Y chromosomes into the analysis of DNA methylation array data

期刊

EPIGENETICS & CHROMATIN
卷 16, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13072-022-00477-0

关键词

X chromosome; Y chromosome; Sex differences; X-chromosome inactivation; Sex chromosomes; DNA methylation; Array; Illumina DNA methylation; Batch-correction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the authors analyzed the DNA methylation (DNAme) array data from X and Y chromosomes of 634 placental samples using Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 DNAme array. They investigated the effects of probe filtering, normalization, and batch correction on X and Y DNAme data. The study identified key factors to be considered during processing and analysis of sex chromosome data, and proposed two analytical methods for XY chromosome data.
BackgroundMany human disease phenotypes manifest differently by sex, making the development of methods for incorporating X and Y-chromosome data into analyses vital. Unfortunately, X and Y chromosome data are frequently excluded from large-scale analyses of the human genome and epigenome due to analytical complexity associated with sex chromosome dosage differences between XX and XY individuals, and the impact of X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) on the epigenome. As such, little attention has been given to considering the methods by which sex chromosome data may be included in analyses of DNA methylation (DNAme) array data.ResultsWith Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 DNAme array data from 634 placental samples, we investigated the effects of probe filtering, normalization, and batch correction on DNAme data from the X and Y chromosomes. Processing steps were evaluated in both mixed-sex and sex-stratified subsets of the analysis cohort to identify whether including both sexes impacted processing results. We found that identification of probes that have a high detection p-value, or that are non-variable, should be performed in sex-stratified data subsets to avoid over- and under-estimation of the quantity of probes eligible for removal, respectively. All normalization techniques investigated returned X and Y DNAme data that were highly correlated with the raw data from the same samples. We found no difference in batch correction results after application to mixed-sex or sex-stratified cohorts. Additionally, we identify two analytical methods suitable for XY chromosome data, the choice between which should be guided by the research question of interest, and we performed a proof-of-concept analysis studying differential DNAme on the X and Y chromosome in the context of placental acute chorioamnionitis. Finally, we provide an annotation of probe types that may be desirable to filter in X and Y chromosome analyses, including probes in repetitive elements, the X-transposed region, and cancer-testis gene promoters.ConclusionWhile there may be no single best approach for analyzing DNAme array data from the X and Y chromosome, analysts must consider key factors during processing and analysis of sex chromosome data to accommodate the underlying biology of these chromosomes, and the technical limitations of DNA methylation arrays.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据