4.5 Article

Continuous-Flow Technology for Chemical Rearrangements: A Powerful Tool to Generate Pharmaceutically Relevant Compounds

期刊

ACS MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.3c00010

关键词

Curtius rearrangement; Hofmann rearrangement; Schmidt rearrangement; flow chemistry; sustainable synthesis; safety

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The handling of hazardous, toxic, and pollutant chemicals and high-risk intermediates remains a challenge for the efficacy, safety, and scale-up of chemical rearrangements. However, continuous-flow technology has emerged as a powerful tool for driving these reactions, offering easy, controlled, and safer chemistry protocols with minimal side products and increased reaction yields. This Technology Note provides an overview of recent chemical rearrangements using continuous-flow approaches, focusing on Curtius, Hofmann, and Schmidt reactions, and showcases their advantages, safety aspects, and applications in generating privileged scaffolds and active pharmaceutical ingredients.
The efficacy, safety, and scale-up of several chemical rearrangements remain unsolved problems due to the associated handling of hazardous, toxic, and pollutant chemicals and high-risk intermediates. For many years batch processes have been considered the only possibility to drive these reactions, but continuous-flow technology has emerged, for both academic laboratories and pharmaceutical companies, as a powerful tool for easy, controlled, and safer chemistry protocols, helping to minimize the formation of side products and increase reaction yields. This Technology Note summarizes recently reported chemical rearrangements using continuous-flow approaches, with a focus on Curtius, Hofmann, and Schmidt reactions. Flow protocols, general advantages and safety aspects, and reaction scope for the generation of both privileged scaffolds and active pharmaceutical ingredients will be showcased.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据