4.6 Article

Effects of a teaching mode combining SimBaby with standardized patients on medical students' attitudes toward communication skills

期刊

BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03869-8

关键词

Simulation-based medical education; Standardized patient; Communication skills; Clinical teaching; SimBaby

资金

  1. Research project on education and teaching reform of Central South University
  2. [2021jy166]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The teaching mode combining SimBaby with standardized patients can improve medical students' attitudes toward communication skills learning, indicating that the organic integration of multiple simulation-based medical teaching methods plays an important role in the acquisition of communication skills.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of a teaching mode combining SimBaby with standardized patients (SP) on medical students' attitudes toward communication skills (CS). MethodsForty 8-year medical program students majoring in clinical medicine were randomly divided into the SimBaby group (n = 20) and the SP + SimBaby group (n = 20). The Communication Skills Attitude Scale (CSAS) was used to evaluate medical students' attitudes toward CS learning. ResultsIn the SimBaby and SP + SimBaby groups, there were no statistically significant differences in the Positive Attitude Subscale (PAS) and Negative Attitude Subscale (NAS) scores between males and females (p > 0.05). Compared to the SimBaby group, the SP + SimBaby group showed statistically significant differences in PAS, NAS, and the two dimensions of importance in medical context and learning (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in the dimensions of excusing and overconfidence (p > 0.05). ConclusionCompared with SimBaby alone, the SP + SimBaby teaching mode can improve medical students' attitude toward CS learning, suggesting that the organic integration of multiple simulation-based medical teaching methods plays an important role in the acquisition of CS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据