4.7 Editorial Material

Navigating a Path to Rifampicin Resistance in Tuberculosis

期刊

MBIO
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.02952-22

关键词

antibiotic tolerance; differentially detectable; drug resistance; persister; rifampicin; tolerance; tuberculosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the development of antibiotic resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a globally important pathogen. The authors use a robotic transwell microtiter system and deep sequencing to study different subpopulations of the bacteria and find that resistance primarily arises from tolerant subpopulations, particularly the differentially detectable (DD) bacteria. This research highlights the role of minority bacterial subpopulations in the development of antibiotic resistance.
For model bacteria, genetic drug resistance usually arises from antibiotic-tolerant subpopulations, but whether this is true for the globally important pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis-the cause of tuberculosis-is not known. Here, we discuss a recent article by Sebastian et al. (J. Sebastian, A. Thomas, C. Levine, R. Shrestha, et al., mBio 14:e0279522, 2023, 10.1128/mbio.02795-22) which leverages a robotic transwell microtiter experimental system coupled with deep sequencing of a barcoded library of M. tuberculosis to answer this question for rifampicin resistance. The authors investigate two distinct forms of antibiotic-tolerant subpopulations-classical tolerance, characterized by prolonged minimum duration of killing, and differentially detectable (DD) bacilli that are viable but can be recovered only in liquid medium as opposed to plating. They demonstrate that, indeed, resistance arises preferentially from both rifampicin-tolerant subpopulations, though earlier in the DD population. Use of barcoded libraries and parallel culture systems shows promise in investigating phenotypes mediated by minority subpopulations of bacteria such as development of antibiotic resistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据