4.5 Article

Bile duct injury following cholecystectomy: delayed referral to a tertiary care center is strongly associated with malpractice litigation

期刊

HPB
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 374-383

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.01.005

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for malpractice litigation in patients with bile duct injury (BDI) referred to a tertiary care center. The results showed that patients in the late-referral group were more likely to have undergone surgical and endoscopic repair before referral. Prompt referral to experienced tertiary care centers without any attempt at repair may reduce the risk of litigation.
Background: Bile duct injury (BDI) following cholecystectomy is associated with malpractice litigation. Aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for litigation in patients with BDI referred in a tertiary care center. Methods: Patients treated for BDI between 1994 and 2016. Stabilized inverse probability therapy weighting was used and multivariable logistic regression analysis identified risk factors for malpractice litigation. Results: Of the 211 treated patients, 98 met the inclusion criteria: early-referral group (<20 days; 51.0%), late-referral (>= 20 days; 49.0%). 36 patients (36.7%) initiated malpractice litigation with verdict in favor of plaintiff in 86.7% of cases (median payment = euro90 500, up to euro600 000). Attempts at surgical and endoscopic repair before referral were significantly higher in late-referral group. Failed postoperative management (delayed referral, attempts at repair before referral) was one of the strongest predictors for litigation. Risk of litigation progressively increased from 23.8%, when referral time was within 19 days, to 54.5% (61-120 days), to 60.0% (121-210 days) and to 65.1% (211-365 days). Discussion: Litigation rate after BDI was 37%. Delayed referral to tertiary care center was one of the strongest predictors for litigation. Prompt referral to tertiary experienced centers without any attempt at repair may reduce the risk of litigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据