4.7 Article

Chinese bayberry (Myrica rubra Sieb. et Zucc.) leaves proanthocyanidins alleviate insulin-resistance via activating PI3K/AKT pathway in HepG2 cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL FOODS
卷 99, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2022.105297

关键词

Proanthocyanidins; Insulin-resistance; Glycogen synthesis; Gluconeogenesis; MicroRNAs

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Ningbo
  2. Talent Introduction Fund of NingboTech University
  3. Ningxia Key Research and Develop- ment Program
  4. [202003N4305]
  5. [20220322Z0056]
  6. [2018BBF02010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chinese bayberry leaves proanthocyanidins (BLPs) have significant effects on hepatic glucose metabolism, promoting glycogen synthesis and reducing gluconeogenesis. These effects may be achieved through the activation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Additionally, BLPs can also regulate the expression of specific miRNAs, further influencing hepatic glucose metabolism.
Chinese bayberry (Myrica rubra Sieb. et Zucc.) leaves proanthocyanidins (BLPs) were natural bioactive com-pounds in the treatment of obesity and diabetes with a unique structural characteristic. This study aimed to investigate the effect of BLPs on hepatic glucose metabolism in insulin-resistant HepG2 cells and elucidate the underlying mechanism. With the supplementation of BLPs, the glucose consumption and glucose uptake in IR-HepG2 cells were increased. BLPs promoted glycogen synthesis via up-regulating p-GSK38 and GYS2 expres-sion, and attenuated gluconeogenesis by down-regulating PEPCK and G6Pase expression. It was attributed to the activation of PI3K/AKT signal pathway by BLPs, which was confirmed using the PI3K inhibitor LY294002. Moreover, BLPs remarkably reduced the expression of miR-29a, miR-423 and miR-122, which involved in he-patic glucose metabolism. Our results provide an insight of the hypoglycemic potential of BLPs on the hepatic glucose metabolism, suggesting that BLPs can be further used as a novel ingredient in functional food.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据