4.2 Article

Metacognitive Improvements Following Cognitive Stimulation Therapy for People with Dementia: Evidence from a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

期刊

CLINICAL GERONTOLOGIST
卷 46, 期 2, 页码 267-276

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/07317115.2022.2155283

关键词

Cognitive stimulation therapy; dementia; metacognition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the impact of a Brazilian adapted version of Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST-Brasil) on self-awareness in people with dementia. The results suggest that CST may improve metacognitive abilities in patients.
ObjectivesImpaired self-awareness is a common feature of dementia, with considerable clinical impact. Some therapeutic strategies such as cognitive stimulation and psychotherapy have been suggested to mitigate loss of awareness. Nevertheless, evidence of intervention improving awareness of deficits is scarce. The present study aims to explore the impact of a Brazilian adapted version of Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST-Brasil), an evidence-based psychosocial intervention for people with dementia (PwD), on the level of awareness, reporting here a secondary outcome of a pilot randomized controlled trial.Methods47 people with mild to moderate dementia attending an out-patient unit were randomly allocated to CST (n = 23) or treatment as usual (TAU) (n = 24) across 7 weeks, in a pilot randomized controlled trial. Awareness was measured before and after the intervention.ResultsResults indicated that people in both groups increased in overall awareness of the disease, but only those receiving CST exhibited improvements of awareness of cognitive ability.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that CST may also improve metacognitive abilities in PwD, which could potentially be applied to other settings with beneficial effects.Clinical ImplicationsConsidering the negative impacts of anosognosia, CST-led improvements in awareness have the potential to benefit PwD and their caregivers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据