4.2 Article

Herpetological remains from the Lower Magdalenian site of El Juyo (Cantabria, Spain): the challenge of reconstructing climate and landscape from poorly diverse assemblages

期刊

HISTORICAL BIOLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08912963.2022.2162396

关键词

Amphibians; reptiles; Dryas I; palaeoclimatology; palaeoenvironment; Cantabrian coast

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article describes the animal assemblages from the El Juyo site and their significance in reconstructing paleoclimate and paleoenvironment using quantitative methods. The study shows that the climate at the site was colder and drier than today, and there were changes in rainfall seasonality. Rating: 8/10.
El Juyo is a Cantabrian Lower Magdalenian cave site located approximately 8 km west of the city of Santander. The excavations covered an area over 40 m(2), and the stratified deposits reach 3.5 m thick, with an estimated duration of Magdalenian occupation of around 1,000 years. Here, we present the first study of the herpetofaunal assemblages from El Juyo and explore their significance in terms of quantitative palaeoclimatic and palaeoenvironmental reconstructions using different quantitative methods. The palaeoherpetofaunal assemblages documented at El Juyo have a much lower diversity than present day. All methods applied to these assemblages characterised the climate as colder (between -8.5 and -3.7 degrees C) and dryer (between -415 and -344 mm) than today, whereas landscape reconstructions suggest humid open area together with a potentially good representation of woodland areas in the vicinity of the site. This indicates that the climate during the Dryas I was much colder and dryer than today, even if the proximity of the sea may have mitigated in some way the harshness of the climate in this area. Rainfall seasonality pattern changed between the coldest periods of the Dryas I and today from more abundant precipitation during summer to late fall and winter maximum.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据