4.5 Article

Production of Paper Using Biopulping of Pineapple Leaves Fibers (PALF) Followed by Chemical and Xylanase-Enzymatic Processing

期刊

JOURNAL OF NATURAL FIBERS
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15440478.2022.2163025

关键词

Tropical biomass; agricultural waste; pineapple leaves; biotechnology; pulping; paper

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pineapple leaf fibers were biopulped with Trametes versicolor and further bleached with xylanase-enzymatic treatment. The biopulping process resulted in significant changes in fiber morphology, chemical composition, and thermal stability. The xylanase-enzymatic treatment improved the whiteness and weight of the paper, but also decreased its mechanical properties.
Pineapple leaf fibers (PALF) were biopulped using Trametes versicolor, and the resulting biopulp was bleached with xylanase-enzymatic treatments. The biopulping was extensively described using determinations of fiber morphology, color, chemical composition, extractive content, and thermal stability using the structural characteristics determined by XRD and paper properties. The results showed that the chemical and enzymatic treatments shortened the fiber, almost to 50%, and the Kappa index decreased from 27 to 13. Cellulose and holocellulose contents increased from 65% to 74% and from 86% to 91%, respectively, but extractives, lignin (from 12% to 4%), pentosans (from 25% to 14%) and the crystallinity decreased from 58% to 67% in both chemical bleaching and further xylanase-enzymatic processing. Xylanase-enzymatic processing allowed us to obtain whiter (increased lightness color and decreased redness and yellowness tonality) and heavier paper, even though it presented decreased mechanical properties (decreased stress resistance, rupture length, tear resistance and index longitudinal tearing). The xylanase-enzymatic treatment with the best pulping and paper properties is when the biopulp is treated with a xylanase enzyme concentration of 0.04% (w/w).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据