4.5 Article

Effect of alkali modification on the powder flowability of rapeseed straw cellulose fibers

期刊

JOURNAL OF NATURAL FIBERS
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15440478.2022.2151546

关键词

Rapeseed straw fiber; cellulosic fiber; surface modification; alkali modification; morphological characteristics; powder flowability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effect of sodium hydroxide modification on the powder flowability of rapeseed straw reinforced fibers. The results showed that the modification reduced the flowability index and improved the morphological and surface characteristics of the fibers. This research has important implications for the industrial application of natural fiber composites.
Powder flowability of natural reinforced fibers has a significant effect on the processing and properties of the composite. Sodium hydroxide modified rapeseed straw reinforced fibers were prepared in four fiber sizes and the powder flowability before and after modification was tested. The results showed that the alkali modification reduced the total flowability index of the fibers by 6-11 within the test range, with the effect on each flowability index in the order of compression > angle of spatula > angle of repose > miformity. This effect was mainly attributed to morphological, chemical and surface characteristics. Moreover, the slimming effect of the alkali modification reduced the average particle size by 9.4% to 30.8%, exacerbating the anisotropy of the morphological structure. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses showed that pectin, lipids, hemicellulose and impurities were removed, exposing the clean rough fiber surface. Box plot analysis showed that the modification resulted in a uniform and regular distribution of shape factors. This work has valuable implications for the industrial application of straw cellulose fibers in the field of natural fiber composites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据