4.6 Review

Inhibitory Potential of Chromene Derivatives on Structural and Non-Structural Proteins of Dengue Virus

期刊

VIRUSES-BASEL
卷 14, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v14122656

关键词

dengue virus; structural proteins; non-structural proteins; flavonoids; chromene; virus inhibitory potential

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dengue fever is a mosquito-borne viral disease that has become a serious health issue globally. This article discusses the potential of chromene derivatives as inhibitors of the dengue virus. The compounds were shown to interfere with various stages of viral entry, assembly, and replication, demonstrating potent activity against the dengue virus.
Dengue fever is a mosquito-borne viral disease that has become a serious health issue across the globe. It is caused by a virus of the Flaviviridae family, and it comprises five different serotypes (DENV-1 to DENV-5). As there is no specific medicine or effective vaccine for controlling dengue fever, there is an urgent need to develop potential inhibitors against it. Traditionally, various natural products have been used to manage dengue fever and its co-morbid conditions. A detailed analysis of these plants revealed the presence of various chromene derivatives as the major phytochemicals. Inspired by these observations, authors have critically analyzed the anti-dengue virus potential of various 4H chromene derivatives. Further, in silico, in vitro, and in vivo reports of these scaffolds against the dengue virus are detailed in the present manuscript. These analogues exerted their activity by interfering with various stages of viral entry, assembly, and replications. Moreover, these analogues mainly target envelope protein, NS2B-NS3 protease, and NS5 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, etc. Overall, chromene-containing analogues exerted a potent activity against the dengue virus and the present review will be helpful for the further exploration of these scaffolds for the development of novel antiviral drug candidates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据