4.6 Article

Targeting a Conserved Lysine in the Hydrophobic Pocket of HIV-1 gp41 Improves Small Molecule Antiviral Activity

期刊

VIRUSES-BASEL
卷 14, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v14122703

关键词

HIV-1; gp41; covalent inhibitor; fusion inhibitor

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigates the conversion of molecules with better drug-like properties to improve antiviral efficacy. By adding an electrophilic warhead, equilibrium binders can be converted into inhibitors. This method shows promise in inhibiting HIV-1 entry.
Human Immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) fusion is mediated by glycoprotein-41, a protein that has not been widely exploited as a drug target. Small molecules directed at the gp41 ectodomain have proved to be poorly drug-like, having moderate efficacy, high hydrophobicity and/or high molecular weight. We recently investigated conversion of a fairly potent hydrophobic inhibitor into a covalent binder, by modifying it to react with a lysine residue on the protein. We demonstrated a 10-fold improvement in antiviral efficacy. Here, we continue this study, utilizing instead molecules with better inherent drug-like properties. Molecules possessing low to no antiviral activity as equilibrium binders were converted into mu M inhibitors upon addition of an electrophilic warhead in the form of a sulfotetrafluorophenyl (STP) activated ester. We confirmed specificity for gp41 and for entry. The small size of the inhibitors described here offers an opportunity to expand their reach into neighboring pockets while retaining drug-likeness. STP esterification of equilibrium binders is a promising avenue to explore for inhibiting HIV-1 entry. Many gp41 targeting molecules studied over the years possess carboxylic acid groups which can be easily converted into the corresponding STP ester. It may be worth the effort to evaluate a library of such inhibitors as a way forward to small molecule inhibition of fusion of HIV and possibly other enveloped viruses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据