4.4 Article

New arthropod-Podostemaceae associations in Central and South America

期刊

ZOOKEYS
卷 -, 期 1129, 页码 45-54

出版社

PENSOFT PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1129.91398

关键词

Aquatic arthropods; freshwater biodiversity; lotic invertebrates; plant-insect interactions; river ecosystems

类别

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-0444589 DEB-1754199]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Podostemaceae are a widespread family of aquatic angiosperms, and their associations with arthropods have been understudied. This study examined Podostemaceae samples from Brazil, Costa Rica, Suriname, and Venezuela and found over 9000 arthropods representing 12 different orders. The findings contribute to the understanding of the arthropod-Podostemaceae associations.
Podostemaceae are a unique family of aquatic angiosperms found in river rapids and waterfalls throughout southern Asia, Africa, and the Americas. Podostemaceae are understudied, and consequently, the arthropods associated with these plants are not well known. We sought to expand knowledge of arthropodPodostemaceae associations to better understand the impact of these plants on aquatic ecosystems and biodiversity. We examined samples of Podostemaceae collected between 1998 and 2007 from Brazil, Costa Rica, Suriname, and Venezuela for arthropods even though these samples were not collected with the intent to investigate arthropod-Podostemaceae associations. We examined 15 samples of Podostemaceae, including 10 species never evaluated for arthropod associations, and found over 9000 arthropods representing 12 different orders. The most abundant orders were Diptera (77.88%), Trichoptera (12.90%), Coleoptera (3.35%), and Lepidoptera (2.42%). We found several arthropods not previously reported from Podostemaceae, including Collembola and Acari, documented several instances of insects boring into plant tissues, and provide the first report of an insect-induced gall on Ceratolacis pedunculatum C.T. Philbrick, Novelo & Irgang.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据