4.6 Article

Sarcopenia is associated with worse surgical complications but not relapse-free survival and overall survival in patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12957-022-02846-1

关键词

Retroperitoneal liposarcoma; Sarcopenia; Surgery complication; Relapse-free survival; Overall survival

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Clinical special funding of the Shanghai Municipal Health Commission [81702893]
  3. [202140083]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the relationship between sarcopenia and severe postoperative complications, relapse-free survival, and overall survival in RLPS patients. The results showed that sarcopenia was associated with severe postoperative complications, but had no impact on relapse-free survival and overall survival.
Objective: This investigation aimed to explore the relationship between sarcopenia and severe postoperative complications, relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLPS).Material and methods: This retrospective study included 72 RLPS patients (47 men, 25 women; mean age, 57.49 years, SD 10.92) who had abdominal CT exams. Clinical information was recorded, including RLPS characteristics (histologic subtypes, grade, size), laboratory assessment (ALB, PALB, A/G, Hb, SCr), relapse-free survival, overall survival, and postoperative complications. The relationships between those variables and RFS and OS were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard models.Results: There were 8 severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade > 2). The chi-square test showed sarcopenia was associated with severe postoperative complications (P = 0.011). In multivariate analysis, sarcopenia was not associated with relapse-free survival (P = 0.574) and overall survival (P = 0.578).Conclusions: Sarcopenia predicts worse surgical complications but does not affect relapse-free survival and overall survival.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据