4.5 Article

Biotreatment of azo dye containing textile industry effluent by a developed bacterial consortium immobilised on brick pieces in an indigenously designed packed bed biofilm reactor

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11274-023-03521-7

关键词

Packed bed biofilm reactor; Brick pieces; Immobilised consortium; Azo dye; Industrial effluent; FTIR; SEM; Biofilm

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a lab-scale Packed-Bed Biofilm Reactor (PBBR) packed with brick pieces for the decolourisation and biodegradation of textile industry effluent. The reactor achieved more than 99% dye decolourisation and >= 92% COD reduction in 6 hours under optimized conditions. In continuous mode, the PBBR showed >= 95% reduction in ADMI and COD values.
This study highlights the development of a lab-scale, indigenously designed; Packed-Bed Biofilm Reactor (PBBR) packed with brick pieces. The developed biofilm in the reactor was used for the decolourisation and biodegradation of the textile industry effluent. The PBBR was continuously operated for 264 days, during which 301 cycles of batch and continuous treatment were operated. In batch mode under optimised conditions, more than 99% dye decolourisation and >= 92% COD reduction were achieved in 6 h of contact time upon supplementation of effluent with 0.25 g L-1 glucose, 0.25 g L-1 urea, and 0.1 g L-1 phosphates. A decolourisation rate of 133.94 ADMI units h(-1) was achieved in the process. PBBR, when operated in continuous mode, showed >= 95% and >= 92% reduction in ADMI and COD values. Subsequent aeration and passage through the charcoal reactor assisted in achieving a >= 96% reduction in COD and ADMI values. An overall increase of 81% in dye-laden effluent decolourisation rate, from 62 to 262 mg L-1 h(-1), was observed upon increasing the flow rate from 18 to 210 mL h(-1). Dye biodegradation was determined by UV-Vis and FTIR spectroscopy and toxicity study. SEM analysis showed the morphology of the attached-growth biofilm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据