4.5 Article

Simultaneous removal of heavy metals and dye from wastewater: modelling and experimental study

期刊

WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 87, 期 1, 页码 193-217

出版社

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2022.410

关键词

adsorption; breakthrough curve; dyes; heavy metals; modeling; wastewater

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, wheat bran was used as an adsorbent to simultaneously remove heavy metals. The presence of dye was found to reduce the removal of each metal, but had no significant effect on dye adsorption. The optimal pH, temperature, and adsorbent dose were determined. Continuous study showed that the presence of dye decreased the effectiveness of the adsorption process.
In this work, heavy metals were removed simultaneously using wheat bran as an adsorbent. For batch experiments, the Box-Behnken design of response surface methodology was used and the effect of dye on metal removal was analysed. It has been observed that the presence of dye has reduced the removal of each metal in the range of 100%-20% with no appreciable reduction in dye adsorption. The optimum pH, temperature, and adsorbent dose were found to be 7.59, 33.23 degrees C, and 2.90 g/L, respectively for 79.70% chromium, 99.9% cadmium and 87.27% copper removal. It was found that Langmuir isotherm fits well with the experimental data (RMSE value up to 0.033). The maximum adsorption capacity obtained for copper, chromium, cadmium and dye were 2.17 mg/g, 1.76 mg/g, 1.52 mg/g and 3.215 mg/g respectively. The continuous study was performed for parameters i.e. bed height (0.15-0.45 m), flow rate (5-15 mL/min) & initial metal concentration (100-500 mg/L). In continuous study, dye acted as an interfering species as a result breakthrough and exhaustion time decreased. The modelling and simulation of continuous adsorption process were performed. A dynamic mathematical model was developed for continuous fixed bed adsorption column to compare the breakthrough curve with experimental results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据