4.6 Article

Epitaxial and textured TiN thin films grown on MgO(100) by reactive HiPIMS: the impact of charging on epitaxial to textured growth crossover

期刊

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/49/45/455301

关键词

thin film; titanium nitride; high power impulse magnetron sputtering; charging effect

资金

  1. Icelandic Research Fund
  2. Foundation for Strategic Research (SSF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ultra-thin TiN films were grown on MgO(100) substrates by high power impulse magnetron sputtering at growth temperatures of 35 degrees C-400 degrees C. Epitaxial TiN films were obtained when a metallic substrate holder is used, while only textured films were achieved for the films grown by HiPIMS using a substrate holder with a ceramic shadow mask. For the entire range of growth temperatures, the epitaxial films are denser and exhibit a higher growth rate compared to the textured films. Also, chemical composition analysis reveals that all the epitaxial TiN films are N-deficient sub-stoichiometric. As the growth temperature increases, the surface roughness of both epitaxial and textured films decreases, however the epitaxial films generally show less roughness than the textured films. In comparison to epitaxial films previously grown by dc magnetron sputtering, the HiPIMS grown epitaxial films are sub-stoichiometric and according to x-ray measurements, they are in a higher strain state whilst presenting higher film density and atomically smoother surfaces. A HiPIMS-induced negative charging of the TiN islands formed on top of the insulating mask is concluded to be the main reason for the growth mode transition from two dimensional Stranski-Krastanov to three dimensional Volmer-Weber when the shadow mask is used. Acceleration of the ionized species of the HiPIMS plasma including Ti+, N+, and Ti2+ toward the substrate when they approach the substrate holder is the reason for the observed changes in the film densities, growth rates, and surface roughness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据