4.8 Article

Cleanup of oils and organic solvents from contaminated water by biomass-based aerogel with adjustable compression elasticity

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 232, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2023.119684

关键词

Polymorphic oil cleanup; Biomass -based aerogels; Carbonization; Compression elasticity; Photothermal conversion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Low-temperature carbonized aerogels derived from biomass materials are proposed as an effective solution for absorbing oils from contaminated water, showing high absorption capacities and separation efficiencies even in harsh environments.
Leakage of oils and organic solvents poses a significant threat to aquatic environments. Here, low-temperature carbonized aerogels with highly porous and anisotropic structures obtained only from biomass-derived materials were proposed to absorb polymorphic oils from contaminated water. Specifically, carbonized aerogels prepared at temperatures of 300 degrees C and 350 degrees C exhibited ultra-high absorption capacities (40-125 g g-1) and oilwater separation efficiencies (> 99%) even in harsh environments, which were attributed to their exceptional properties, including high porosity, abundant macropores, excellent thermal stability, and hydrophobicity. Through citric acid crosslinking and low-temperature carbonization, the aerogels exhibited superior compression elasticity and could be cyclically utilized through simple extrusion while realizing the recovery of oils. Moreover, the outstanding photothermal conversion properties obtained through carbonization contributed to the high temperature and fluidity of the oils surrounding the aerogels, which is crucial for improving the absorption performance of high-viscosity oils. Such absorbent materials are used to separate crude oil from oil-water mixtures, which can achieve maximum absorption of 56 g g-1 and increase the absorption rate (from several days to 10 min) in a low-temperature (4 degrees C) seawater environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据