4.8 Article

Effect of a karst system (France) on extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 230, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2023.119582

关键词

Antibiotic -resistance; Escherichia coli; Karst; One health; Water resource

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the effect of karst on antibiotic-resistant bacteria, specifically extended-spectrum beta-lactamases-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-Ec), in a rural karst hydrosystem providing drinking water. The concentrations of ESBL-Ec were found to be spatially and temporally heterogeneous, with no filtration effect observed in the karst. The results suggest that karst poses a risk for the transmission of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
Karst aquifers are an important water resource worldwide particularly exposed to anthropogenic pollution, including antibiotic-resistance. The release of antibiotic-resistant bacterial pathogens in the environment is a major public health challenge worldwide. In this One Health study, we aimed to determine the effect of karst on antibiotic-resistant bacteria. For this purpose, we determined the concentrations of extended-spectrum beta-lacta-mases-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-Ec) for 92 weeks in a rural karst hydrosystem providing drinking water. ESBL-Ec isolates (n = 130) were sequenced by whole genome sequencing. We analysed the isolates at different levels of granularity, i.e., phylogroup, sequence type, presence of antibiotic-resistance genes, mutations conferring antibiotic-resistance, and virulence genes. The ESBL-Ec concentrations were spatially and temporally heterogeneous in the studied karst hydrosystem. ESBL-Ec isolates survived in the karst and their concentrations were mostly explained by the hydrodynamic of the hydrosystem. We demonstrate that the studied karst has no filtration effect on ESBL-Ec, either quantitatively (i.e., in the ESBL-Ec concentrations) or qualitatively (i.e., in the genetic characteristics of ESBL-Ec isolates).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据