4.6 Article

Epoxy lining influence on recycled water quality during pipeline transit for potable reuse

期刊

WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH
卷 94, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/wer.10818

关键词

advanced treated recycled water; clogging potential; epoxy lining; managed aquifer recharge; pipeline transit; potable reuse

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the effect of an epoxy liner on the clogging potential of water conveyed through a pipeline. The results showed that the epoxy liner can effectively reduce the clogging potential of recycled water, likely by reducing the accumulation of particles and biomass load during pipeline transit.
An epoxy treatment was applied to a pipeline used to convey advanced treated recycled water from a purification facility to a recharge site. The epoxy treatment was applied to prevent further deterioration (corrosion) of the interior cement mortar lining (CML). A soil column study was conducted to evaluate the effect of the epoxy liner on the clogging potential of water before and after conveyance. The clogging potential was represented by differences in the column's relative hydraulic conductivity and water quality, between the treatment plant and injection site, before and after epoxy lining. Hydraulic conductivity of columns at the injection well site declined rapidly before epoxy and improved considerably after epoxy application. Total suspended solids (TSS) and cellular adenosine triphosphate (cATP) median concentrations improved significantly. Before epoxy, TSS increased with pipeline transit from 0.005 to 0.053 (mg/L) compared with 0.009mg/L after epoxy. Before epoxy, cATP increased from 0.14 to 1.6 pg/ml across pipeline transit compared with 0.37pg/ml after epoxy. Aluminum and nitrate followed similar trends. Results indicate that epoxy liner reduced the clogging potential of high purity recycled water, likely due to a decrease in particle and biomass load (clogging constituents) accumulated during pipeline transit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据