4.3 Article

Development of immunodiagnostic tools for in situ investigation of Ovis aries papillomavirus 3 (OaPV3)

期刊

VETERINARY RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
卷 47, 期 2, 页码 641-649

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11259-022-10018-5

关键词

Viral oncogenesis; Papillomavirus; Squamous cell carcinoma; Immunological tools; FFPE; Diagnostics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is a malignant lesion characterized by the proliferation and transformation of keratinocytes in the epidermis and dermis. It is caused by a combination of sunlight exposure and Papillomavirus (PV) infection. This paper reports the development of specific serological tools for studying the pathogenicity of Ovis aries papillomavirus 3 (OaPV3) and discusses their potential significance in investigating viral properties and diagnosis.
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is a malignant lesion characterized by proliferation and transformation of keratinocytes in the epidermis and infiltrating derma. cSCC is reported in domestic and wild animal species, worldwide. The occurrence and development of cSCC rely on synergic multifactorial conditions, most importantly sunlight exposure and Papillomavirus (PV) infection. In sheep, the development of such lesions represents a threat both to animal welfare and milk production. Ovis aries papillomavirus 3 (OaPV3) is the main cSCC viral determinant and oncogenic properties of viral E6 and E7 proteins were preliminarily investigated. However, E6 and E7 role and mechanisms resulting in cSCC have not been fully clarified, mainly due to the lack specific immunological tools, such as antibodies for in situ detection of ovine papillomavirus. This paper reports the development of specific serological tools for the investigation of OaPV3 pathogenicity, and their preliminary use to screen 4 ovine cSSC formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissues. Relevance of immunological tools to investigation of viral biological properties and diagnosis are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据