4.6 Article

Planar hollow cathode sputtering with asymmetrical voltage supply

期刊

VACUUM
卷 207, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2022.111570

关键词

hollow cathode discharge; planar cathode discharge; sputtering system

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article studies a planar hollow cathode discharge (HCD) system with an asymmetric negative potential applied to parallel cathodes. It is found that the hollow cathode effect can be preserved when an additional high voltage bias is applied to one of the cathodes. The performance of the HCD system under different argon pressures was investigated by measuring the current-voltage characteristics of the iron cathode/target. In addition, the iron deposition rate in a sputtering system based on the HCD was studied under different conditions.
This article studies a planar hollow cathode discharge (HCD) with an asymmetric negative potential applied to parallel cathodes. The hollow cathode effect is preserved when an additional high voltage bias is applied to one of cathodes. For the argon pressures of 15, 20 and 60 Pa, the current-voltage characteristics of the HCD were obtained with an extra bias voltage applied on the iron cathode/target. The paper describes the sputtering system based on a HCD, consisting of two cathodes: a flat target and a tungsten mesh located at a distance of 7 mm, through which the deposited material passes. At the argon pressure of 40 Pa, the dynamics of the local plasma parameters and the iron deposition rate on a substrate under floating potential located at a distance of 40 mm from the grid were measured. The asymmetrical voltage supply in hollow cathode sputtering lead to a significant increase in the iron sputtering rate (from 2 to 16 nm/min), which is associated with both an increase in the plasma density and the sputtering coefficient of the target material. Sputtering system based on a planar HCD is advantageous due to the absence of magnetic field, which facilitates deposition of soft magnetic materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据