4.7 Review

Aptamers functionalized metal and metal oxide nanoparticles: Recent advances in heavy metal monitoring

期刊

TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 157, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2022.116748

关键词

Heavy metals; Metal nanoparticles; Metal oxide nanoparticles; Aptamers; Oligonucleotides; Detection; Adsorption

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review provides an update on the progress of using nucleobases and aptamers functionalized nano-particles for the monitoring of heavy metal ions. Gold nanoparticles are commonly used, but other nanoparticles show promise as well. Electrochemical methods have the best performance.
Heavy metal contamination has long been a major hazard to the entire ecological system and human beings. Consequently, sensitive and reliable methods have been developed for the detection of heavy metal ions from different systems. Advancements in biotechnology, and in functional nucleic acids specifically, have offered new methods for heavy metal monitoring based on the specific interactions of aptamers with heavy metal ions. The introduction of nanoparticles to aptamer-based technologies has also presented its advantages of increased immobilization efficiency, sensitivity and selectivity. Thus, this review provides an update on the progress of using nucleobases and aptamers functionalized nano -particles for the monitoring of heavy metal ions. The aptamer-based detection of heavy metal ions using metallic and metallic oxide nanoparticles are emphasized. Even though gold nanoparticles are the most commonly used with aptamers for the detection of heavy metal ions reporting extremely low detection limits, several other nanoparticles have emerged as promising modifications to aptamers in heavy metal monitoring as well. Comparing the different techniques used, electrochemical methods have presented the best performance while offering their advantages over optical and spectrometric techniques. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据