4.7 Review

Paper-based devices for rapid diagnosis and wastewater surveillance

期刊

TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 157, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2022.116760

关键词

Paper-based analytical device; Infectious disease; Point-of-care diagnosis; Wastewater-based epidemiology

资金

  1. UK Royal Academy of Engineering [FF\1920\1\36]
  2. NERC [NE/R013349/2]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China [226-2022-00178, 226-2022-00214]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper critically reviews the recent development of paper-based analytical devices (PADs) for the diagnosis of infectious diseases and wastewater monitoring. PADs have attracted significant attention due to their rapid and low-cost nature, facilitating a better understanding of the transmission routes of infectious diseases within populations.
Infectious diseases are a global concern for public health resulting in high rates of infection with sub-sequent health and socio-economic impacts through resulting morbidity and mortality. The emergence of such diseases has motivated researchers to develop cost-effective, rapid and sensitive analytical methods and devices to better understand the transmission routes of infections within populations. To this end, rapid and low-cost diagnosis and testing devices for infectious diseases are attracting increasing amounts of attention, e.g., through using paper-based analytical devices (PADs). In this paper, the recent development of PADs is critically reviewed both for the diagnosis of inviduals and population health, by using devices for testing wastewater. Finally, the review also focuses on PADs for the analysis of bacteria and viruses in wastewater, together with a discussion on thee future development of PADs for rapid diagnosis and wastewater surveillance.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据