4.5 Article

Expansion of the application domain of a macromolecular ocular irritation test (OptiSafeTM)

期刊

TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO
卷 86, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2022.105515

关键词

Ocular irritation; Validation; Application domain; OptiSafe; Nonanimal eye irritation test

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the accuracy of the OptiSafe (OS) test for an expanded application domain, including additional ocular corrosives and previously excluded foaming agents. The results show that both the original and updated OS methods have a high accuracy for the expanded application domain that included ocular corrosives and surfactants.
The OptiSafe (OS) test is shelf-stable, macromolecular eye irritation test that does not include any animal ingredient or component (vegan). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the test's accuracy for an expanded application domain for both the original and recently updated OS method. This study involved the testing of additional ocular corrosives and previously excluded foaming agents (surfactants) using both the original and updated OS methods and then combining these data with prior validation data for a total of 147 chemicals. Predictivity was evaluated by a statistical comparison of the OptiSafe predictions with historical in vivo Draize rabbit eye data for the same chemicals (from public databases). We report that for the detection of chemicals not requiring classification for eye irritation [Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) No Category], the accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity were 92.8%, 79.6%, and 100.0%, respectively, for the updated method; for the detection of chemicals inducing extreme eye damage/corrosion (GHS Category 1), the accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity were 79.4%, 71.8%, and 91.7%, respectively, for the updated method. Results indicate that both the original and updated methods have a high accuracy for the expanded application domain that included ocular corrosives and surfactants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据