4.6 Article

PRSS2 overexpression relates to poor prognosis and promotes proliferation, migration and invasion in gastric cancer

期刊

TISSUE & CELL
卷 79, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.tice.2022.101949

关键词

PRSS2; Gastric cancer; Proliferation; Migration; Invasion; Prognosis

资金

  1. Nantong Science and Technology Project
  2. Nantong University Clinical Medicine Special Project
  3. [MSZ19196]
  4. [2019LQ003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Overexpression of PRSS2 in gastric cancer is associated with poor prognosis and can serve as a potential biomarker for assessing the prognosis of gastric cancer. Knockdown of PRSS2 reduces the proliferation, migration, and invasion of GC cells.
Serine protease 2 (PRSS2) plays a pivotal role in tumor pathogenesis as a serine protease. In this paper, we investigated the expression and role of PRSS2 in gastric cancer (GC). Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), western blotting and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were performed to detect PRSS2 expression in GC tissues. The correlations between PRSS2 and clinicopathological variables and prognosis were analyzed. The effects of PRSS2 on gastric cancer in vitro and in vivo were detected by Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8), colony formation assay, migration and invasion test, and nude mouse experiment. We observed that the PRSS2 mRNA and protein levels were upregulated in GC tissues, and PRSS2 expression was associated with GC N stage. Patients with high PRSS2 expression have a poor prognosis. Finally, the regulatory effect of PRSS2 on the biological behaviors of GC cells was assessed in GC cells transfected with lentiviral interference fragments of PRSS2. The results suggested that PRSS2 knockdown decreased the proliferation, migration and invasion of GC cells and downregulated MMP-9 expression. In summary, PRSS2 overexpression is associated with poor postoperative prognosis in GC patients and can be used as a potential biomarker to assess the prognosis of GC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据