4.5 Editorial Material

Comments on isothermal crystallization kinetics of polymers: Polypropylene at high supercooling

期刊

THERMOCHIMICA ACTA
卷 718, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tca.2022.179370

关键词

Crystallization kinetics; Non-integer Avrami exponent; Calcium carbonate; FSC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A robust procedure for isothermal kinetic evaluation of DSC measurements of polymers is proposed, considering experimental uncertainties. The procedure is applied to the crystallization of different polypropylenes and reveals the presence of homogeneous nucleation at lower temperatures, with diffusion control becoming more prominent at lower temperatures.
A robust procedure for isothermal kinetic evaluation of Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) measurements of polymers using the Kolmogorov-Johnson-Mehl-Avrami (KJMA) equation is proposed. This procedure takes into account the experimental uncertainties for short (initial deflection) and long (secondary crystallization) measurement times. This procedure is applied to the isothermal crystallization of various commercially available isotactic polypropylenes (iPP) in the temperature range between 10 degrees C and 120 degrees C. Further measurements are performed on unfilled iPP and iPP highly filled with calcium carbonate. The measurements were performed using Fast Differential Scanning Calorimetry (FDSC). Evaluation of the crystallization kinetics indicates homogeneous nucleation in the temperature range of mesophase formation below 60 degrees C. With decreasing temperature, the crystallization is more affected by diffusion control and/or termination of growth at an early crystallization stage During alpha-phase formation (above 60 degrees C), crystallization is heterogeneously nucleated. Depending on the sample, growth occurs at a constant rate or is diffusion controlled. Polypropylene highly filled with calcium carbonate shows an additional alpha-phase crystallization process. The KJMA evaluation indicates that this process is homogeneously nucleated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据