4.2 Article

Accuracy of electronic density calculated using an optimally tuned range-separated hybrid functional

期刊

THEORETICAL CHEMISTRY ACCOUNTS
卷 142, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00214-022-02952-z

关键词

Electronic density; Dipole moment; OT-RSH; DFT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We quantitatively studied the accuracy of electronic density calculated using the optimally tuned range-separated hybrid (OT-RSH) functional method in this research. The dipole moments of 152 polar molecules were calculated using the OT-RSH functional and compared with literature coupled-cluster calculations. Another test set consisting of 14 closed-shell diatomic molecules was used to evaluate the performance of OT-RSH in predicting electronic densities. The results showed that OT-RSH-derived electronic densities and dipole moments were as accurate as some better performing global hybrid functionals, overcoming the limitations of empirical choices in traditional global hybrid functionals.
We provide a quantitative study of the accuracy of the electronic density calculated using density functional theory. Specifically, we consider the recently developed optimally tuned range-separated hybrid (OT-RSH) functional approach. We calculate dipole moments using OT-RSH functional across a database of 152 polar molecules and compare them to literature coupled-cluster calculations with single and double excitations and perturbative triples (CCSD(T)) data. We also consider another test set of 14 closed-shell diatomic molecules to quantify the performance of OT-RSH functional in predicting the electronic densities using CCSD densities as a reference. We find that OT-RSH functional-derived electronic densities and dipole moments are as accurate as some better performing global hybrid functionals. Also, OT-RSH overcomes the empiricism and limited predictive power associated with the arbitrary choice of the amount of Fock exchange in the traditional global hybrid functional.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据