4.7 Article

Liquid-liquid microextraction with hydrophobic deep eutectic solvent followed by magnetic phase separation for preconcentration of antibiotics

期刊

TALANTA
卷 252, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123868

关键词

liquid-Liquid microextraction; Magnetic phase separation; Hydrophobic deep eutectic solvent; Magnetic nanoparticles; HPLC-FLD; Fluoroquinolones

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a miniaturized liquid-liquid microextraction method using magnetic nanoparticles and deep eutectic solvents for the separation and preconcentration of trace fluoroquinolone antibiotics from environmental waters. The method shows high recovery rates, sensitivity, and environmental friendliness.
This study describes a miniaturized approach for liquid-liquid microextraction based on mass transfer into low volume of deep eutectic solvent and magnetic phase separation, using specially produced magnetic chromium dioxide nanoparticles with a hydrophobic surface layer of fatty acids. The nanoparticles modified with fatty acid helped to recover low volumes of viscous hydrophobic deep eutectic solvent-based extract reproducibly and easily (up to 10 mu L) in a microextraction procedure with the application of magnetic forces. It was demonstrated that the collector properties depend on nanoparticles' surface and magnetic characteristics. The developed approach was implemented for the separation and preconcentration of trace fluoroquinolone antibiotics from environmental waters prior to their determination by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluoro-metric detection as a model analytical task. The limits of detection, calculated from a blank test based on 3a, were 0.01 mu g L-1 for ofloxacin, 0.02 mu g L-1 for lomefloxacin and fleroxacin, and 0.04 mu g L-1 for norfloxacin. The procedure provides significant solvent reduction and high enrichment factors. The approach is green, which is proved by the analytical eco-scale assessment tool with the total score equal to 85 out of 100.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据