4.7 Article

A smartphone readout device for portable and sensitive estimation of Hg2+ via coumarin-modified paper

期刊

TALANTA
卷 252, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123849

关键词

Coumarin-modified paper; Smartphone; Hg2+; Fluorescence sensor; 3D printing technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, an economical and effective sensing system for Hg2+ quantitation was developed using a smartphone as a processing platform. The system integrated coumarin-modified paper as a probe and demonstrated high sensitivity and selectivity for Hg2+ detection. The smartphone-based system showed great potential for on-site and portable monitoring of Hg2+ in environmental water.
The development of cost-effective sensing system for Hg2+ quantitation is highly demanded for environmental monitoring. In this work, we reported an on-site, rapid and portable smartphone-based Hg2+ sensing system integrating coumarin-modified paper as a probe and smartphone readout device as a processing platform. For fluorescent sensing of Hg2+, the modified paper was fabricated by chemically grafting a coumarin-based probe N-((7-hydroxy-coumarin-3-yl)carbamothioyl)acetamide (HCCA) onto paper, and its physicochemical properties and sensing performance were characterized by elemental analysis, FTIR, XPS, SEM, and fluorescence spectral analysis. The modified paper displayed high selectivity and sensitivity for Hg2+, accompanied with a distinct fluorescence color change. For portable detection of the fluorescent sensors, a smartphone readout device was designed, consisting of a removable 3D-printed hardware device and an application. Remarkably, the smartphone readout device in cooperation with the modified paper is highly selective and sensitive to Hg2+ with the limit of detection (LOD) of 0.46 ppb, which avoids the requirement of sophisticated equipment and complex operation. The cost-effective sensing system based on smartphone shows a great potential for monitoring of Hg2+ in environmental water.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据