4.2 Article

Theoretical and Pre-Clinical Models of Vacuum Assisted Closure

期刊

SURGICAL INNOVATION
卷 30, 期 4, 页码 533-537

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/15533506221142690

关键词

biomedical engineering; general surgery; simulation; surgical education

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC) has revolutionized the treatment of complex and chronic wounds by directly applying mechanical forces to the wound surface. This interaction between the VAC device and the wound causes deformation and stretching of cells, while also promoting fluid removal from the tissues. The use of VAC devices has been shown to enhance angiogenesis and improve vessel morphology compared to standard dressings, with factors such as foam pore size, pressure, and waveform playing a role in the therapeutic effect.
Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC) has changed how physicians treat complex and chronic wounds. For over 20 years, we have studied the mechanism of action of these devices in both an academic based research laboratory and in an industry-based laboratory.We performed a literature review of the theoretical and pre-clinical published studies from the two labs which related to the biomechanics of open pore reticulated polyurethane interfaces.The VAC device applies a direct mechanical interface to the wound surface. The interaction of the foam under suction with the wound surface causes surface deformation and cell stretch. The suction removes fluid from the tissues. There are increases in angiogenesis with better vessel morphology than standard dressings. The effect is dependent on the pore size of the foam, the pressure of application and the waveform of application. Undoubtedly, patient factors such as age, diabetes and radiation affect the response.Pre-clinical studies can help in the design and optimization of mechanical-based wound healing devices. Current work on the effects of these devices on lymphatics and scarring are areas of active investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据