Textbook outcomes and benchmarks of minimally invasive left lateral sectionectomy across North America

BackgroundMinimally invasive approach represents the gold standard for the resection of the left lateral section of the liver. Recently, the American Minimally Invasive Liver Resection (AMILES) registry has become available to track outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic liver resection in the Americas. The aim of the present study is to determine the benchmark performance of MILLS throughout the AMILES database. MethodsThe AMILES registry was interrogated for cases of minimally invasive left lateral sectionectomies (MILLS). Centers with best practices according to the achievement of textbook outcomes (TOs) were identified and were used to define benchmark performances. ResultsSeven institutions from US and Canada entered 1665 minimally invasive liver resections, encompassing 203 MILLS. Overall, 49% of cases of MILLS satisfied contemporarily all textbook outcomes. While all centers obtained TOs with different rates of success, the outcomes of the top-ranking centers were used for benchmarking. Benchmark performance metrics of MILLS across North America are: conversion rate & LE; 3.7%, blood loss & LE; 200 ml, OR time & LE; 199 min, transfusion rate & LE; 4.5%, complication rate & LE; 7.9%, LOS & LE; 4 days. ConclusionBenchmark performances of MILLS have been defined on a large multi-institutional database in North America. As more institutions join the collaboration and more prospective cases accrue, benchmark for additional procedures and approaches will be defined.

Automated summary

The aim of this study was to determine the benchmark performance of MILLS throughout the AMILES database. Results showed that among 1665 minimally invasive liver resections, 49% of MILLS cases met all textbook outcomes. Benchmark performance metrics for MILLS included conversion rate, blood loss, OR time, transfusion rate, complication rate, and length of stay.