Cold snare polypectomy versus cold endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BackgroundCold snare polypectomy (CSP) is recommended for the resection of small colorectal polyps. However, few studies have investigated the efficacy of cold endoscopic mucosal resection (cold EMR) for small polyps. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of cold EMR compared with CSP for small colorectal polyps.MethodsThis was a multicenter, randomized trial conducted in three tertiary centers from January 2018 to February 2021. Patients with polyps sized 6-10 mm were randomized to CSP or cold EMR group. After polypectomy, two additional biopsies were performed to assess the completeness of resection. The primary outcome was complete polyp resection rate. Secondary outcomes were total procedure time and rate of adverse events such as immediate bleeding, delayed bleeding, and perforation.ResultsA total of 444 polyps in 327 patients were assessed and randomly assigned to each group. Of those, 425 polyps were finally analyzed based on pathology results. The complete resection rate was not significantly different between cold EMR and CSP groups (91.9% vs 89.8%, p = 0.24). However, the total procedure time was significantly increased in cold EMR (87.6 s vs. 45.8 s, p < 0.001). The rate of polypectomy adverse events was not significantly different between the two groups. No patient had massive bleeding or perforation.ConclusionsThere was no difference in complete resection rate or adverse events between CSP and cold EMR. However, CSP reduced the total procedure time.

Automated summary

This study compared the efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and cold endoscopic mucosal resection (cold EMR) for small colorectal polyps. The results showed no significant difference in complete resection rate or adverse events between the two methods, but CSP reduced the total procedure time.