4.7 Article

Substrate-binding guides individual melibiose permeases MelB to structurally soften and to destabilize cytoplasmic middle-loop C3

期刊

STRUCTURE
卷 31, 期 1, 页码 58-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2022.11.011

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, single-molecule force spectroscopy was used to investigate the substrate-induced structural changes of MelB from Salmonella typhimurium. The results showed that in the absence of substrate, MelB equally populated two different states, with one state showing higher mechanical structural stability. However, in the presence of melibiose or a coupling Na+-cation, MelB increasingly populated a mechanically less stable state. In the presence of both substrate and co-substrate, this mechanically less stable state of MelB was predominant. These findings provide mechanistic insights into the symport action of galactosides and cations catalyzed by MelB.
The melibiose permease MelB is a well-studied Na+-coupled transporter of the major facilitator superfamily. However, the symport mechanism of galactosides and cations is still not fully understood, especially at struc-tural levels. Here, we use single-molecule force spectroscopy to investigate substrate-induced structural changes of MelB from Salmonella typhimurium. In the absence of substrate, MelB equally populates two different states, from which one shows higher mechanical structural stability with additional stabilization of the cytoplasmic middle-loop C3. In the presence of either melibiose or a coupling Na+-cation, however, MelB increasingly populates the mechanically less stable state, which shows a destabilized middle-loop C3. In the presence of both substrate and co-substrate, this mechanically less stable state of MelB is predominant. Our findings describe how both substrates guide MelB transporters to populate two different mechanically stabilized states, and contribute mechanistic insights to the alternating-access action for the galactoside/cation symport catalyzed by MelB.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据