4.7 Article

Branched Neural Network based model for cutter wear prediction in machine tools

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/14759217221138568

关键词

Tool wear; wear parameter analysis; processing parameter adjustment; neural network model; sensor data analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cutter wear has a significant impact on machining quality, especially for high precision machining. This paper proposes a real-time machining status monitoring method using external sensor data. A tool wear forecast model is introduced, and multiple process parameters and sensor data are collected. The model is based on a Branched Neural Network and outperforms other algorithms in terms of prediction accuracy.
Cutter wear has a great impact on machining quality, which is particularly true when demand for machining accuracy is high. Therefore, cutter wear analysis is critical in assuring high machining quality and long tool life. However, it is highly dangerous and difficult to monitor and determine tool wear conditions during machining. This paper proposes a method of real-time machining status monitoring using the data collected by external sensors without interfering with the machining process. A tool wear forecast model is introduced in this article. Multiple process parameters and sensor data are collected. Due to missing data, however, data preprocessing is done applying the interpolation or extrapolation approach and data are standardized in order to create an artificial intelligence-based model. The said model will then be used to forecast tool wear during different processing stages and be compared with other different models, such as: AdaBoost, Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, and Random Forest. The model developed in this study is based on a Branched Neural Network, which generates the best prediction results among all publicly available algorithms. This approach helps reduce the mean absolute error and root-mean-square error values and can improve by 0.11 in R-2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据