4.5 Article

Investigation of Multistage Oxidation Behavior of Al4SiC4 Powders with Aid of Back Propagation Artificial Neural Network

期刊

STEEL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 94, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/srin.202200694

关键词

Al4SiC4; back propagation artificial neural network; extrapolation ability; multistage oxidation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By training and employing BP-ANN, the multistage oxidation behavior of aluminum silicon carbide (Al4SiC4) was investigated, considering the oxidation temperature, time, and aspect ratio. The results showed that the BP-ANN model can accurately and efficiently simulate the oxidation behavior of Al4SiC4 powders with different reaction laws. In addition, the extrapolation ability of the BP-ANN model allows for maintaining high accuracy and expanding the experimental data to 1.2 times the original range with a coefficient of determination >= 0.801. By incorporating a real physical picture model developed by the research group, the experimental data can be further expanded to 2.2 times. This study provides a new path for understanding the oxidation behavior of materials with multistage oxidation.
In order to investigate the multistage oxidation behavior of aluminum silicon carbide (Al4SiC4), back propagation artificial neural network (BP-ANN) has been trained and employed considering the oxidation temperature, time, and aspect ratio. The results denote that the BP-ANN model can accurately and efficiently simulate the oxidation behavior of Al4SiC4 powders with different reaction laws. In addition, the extrapolation ability suggests that the BP-ANN model can maintain a high accuracy with the coefficient of determination >= 0.801 to expand the experimental data to 1.2 times the original range. By incorporating a real physical picture model developed by the research group, the experimental data can be further expanded to 2.2 times. This study can provide a new path to recognize the oxidation behavior of materials with multistage oxidation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据