4.3 Article

Responses of rubber tree seedlings (Hevea brasiliensis) to phosphorus deficient soils

期刊

SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION
卷 69, 期 2, 页码 78-87

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00380768.2022.2164675

关键词

Hevea brasiliensis; rubber tree seedlings; P deficiency; photosynthesis; root architecture

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the responses of rubber tree seedlings to high and low phosphorus (P) soils. It found that low P significantly reduced leaf P content and photosynthetic capabilities, and induced the accumulation of phenolic and flavonoid compounds in old leaves. Root traits were also significantly affected early on, with increased root surface area and volume through reduced lateral root branching and increased lateral root length. These findings provide new insights into rubber tree physiology and effective fertilization management in low P soils.
While the adaptation and responses of model plants to phosphorus (P) deficiency are well documented, those of the rubber tree remain unclear. Here, we investigated above- and below-ground responses of rubber tree seedlings over the development of the first to third extension unit in a mesocosm system. Rubber tree seedlings were grown in high and low phosphorus soil for 7 months. Tissue nutrient contents, morphological, and physiological traits were quantified. We found that low P significantly reduced leaf P content, photosynthetic capabilities, and induced the accumulation of phenolic and flavonoid compounds, particularly in old leaves. Root traits were significantly affected by P stress early in their development. Root surface area and volume were increased through reduced lateral root branching and increased lateral root length. The alteration of root architectural traits took place prior to the reduction of P content in roots and leaves. Our findings provide new insights into rubber tree physiology and the effective fertilization management of rubber plantation in low P soils.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据