4.6 Article

Mechanobiological tissue instability induced by stress-modulated growth

期刊

SOFT MATTER
卷 19, 期 4, 页码 708-722

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2sm01195f

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a theoretical model is proposed to investigate the mechanobiological response of soft tissues undergoing stress-modulated growth. It is found that non-uniform stresses, which evolve with tissue growth, can produce up-down asymmetric surface morphologies. The study provides insights into the morphological changes of biological tissues under physiological and pathological conditions.
The growth of biological tissues, which is regulated by a variety of factors, can induce stresses that may, in turn, destabilize the tissues into diverse patterns. In most previous studies, however, tissue growth was usually assumed as a prescribed parameter independent of stresses, limiting our understanding of the mechanobiological morphogenesis of real tissues. In this paper, we propose a theoretical model to investigate the mechanobiological response of soft tissues undergoing stress-modulated growth. Linear stability analysis is first performed to elucidate the surface instability mechanism induced by stress-modulated volumetric growth. We further conduct finite element simulations to validate the theoretical prediction and, particularly, to capture the post-buckling pattern evolution. Our results show that the non-uniform stresses, which evolve with the tissue growth and morphogenesis, exert mechanical feedback on the growth itself, producing up-down asymmetric surface morphologies as observed in, for example, the gyrification of human brains and brain organoids. It is also revealed that large residual stresses are unnecessary to cause mechanobiological instability and subsequent asymmetric patterning, which has long been believed to be driven by sufficiently high stresses. The present work could help us to understand the morphological changes of biological tissues under physiological and pathological conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据