4.6 Article

Studying the high-rate deformation of soft materials via laser-induced membrane expansion

期刊

SOFT MATTER
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 276-281

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2sm01392d

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cavitation is a phenomenon that occurs when the internal pressure of a material exceeds the resistance to deformation provided by the surrounding medium. We introduce a new measurement called laser-induced membrane expansion (LIME) to measure the shear modulus of thin membranes at high strain rates by using laser ablation. Using LIME, we study the mechanical properties of PDMS membranes at different thicknesses and crosslink densities and find that the shear modulus is weakly dependent on the crosslink density but strongly strain rate dependent.
Cavitation is a phenomenon that occurs when the internal pressure of a material exceeds the resistance to deformation provided by the surrounding medium. Several measurements, such as the blister test, bubble inflation, and cavitation rheology, take advantage of this phenomenon to measure the local mechanical properties of soft materials at relatively low deformation rates. Here, we introduce a new measurement called laser-induced membrane expansion (LIME) that measures the shear modulus of a thin membrane at high strain rates (approximate to 10(6) s(-1) to 10(8) s(-1)) by using laser ablation to rapidly expand a thin (tens of microns) elastomeric membrane. To demonstrate the capabilities of this measurement, we use LIME to study the mechanical properties of poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) membranes at several thicknesses (from 10 mu m to 60 mu m) and crosslink densities. We find that the shear modulus of the PDMS measured by LIME was weakly dependent on the crosslink density, but was strongly strain rate dependent with values ranging from 10(6) Pa to 10(8) Pa. This measurement platform presents a new approach to studying the mechanical properties of soft but thin materials over a range of deformation rates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据