4.3 Article

An assessment of small ruminant production, marketing, and investment options in Somaliland: A system dynamics approach

期刊

SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH
卷 218, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2022.106882

关键词

Livestock; System dynamics model; Somaliland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A complex set of factors, including feed supply, diseases, and demand, affect livestock production and sale in Somaliland. A system dynamics (SD) model is constructed to simulate the impacts of baseline dynamics and alternative interventions to address constraints. The study finds that Somaliland incurs high economic losses due to animal export bans associated with Rift valley fever (RVF) outbreaks and lack of pasture during droughts. The adoption of optimization of animal herd sizes could enhance productivity and reverse the long-run erosion of stocking capacity.
A complex set of factors affect the production and sale of livestock in Somaliland, including feed supply, diseases, and demand, among others. This study constructs a system dynamics (SD) model to simulate the impacts of baseline dynamics and alternative value chain interventions to address inherent constraints. Findings indicate that Somaliland incurs high economic losses due to occasional animal export bans associated with Rift valley fever (RVF) outbreaks (up to 12% of GDP) and lack of pasture during droughts, given the lack of effort by producers to balance their flock sizes with stocking capacity. Under the baseline conditions, prospects for growth of the small ruminants' sector are poor as the stocking rate is centered and stagnated at about 2.54 million TLUs, and a decline is projected in the long run. In contrast, the adoption of optimization of animal herd sizes in order to balance feed demand with supply could (ceteris-paribus) enhance productivity, boosting exports and domestic supply of slaughter animals and also lead to improved rangeland conditions, ultimately reversing the projected long-run erosion of stocking capacity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据