4.8 Article

Molecularly Hybridized Conduction in DPP-Based Donor-Acceptor Copolymers toward High-Performance Iono-Electronics

期刊

SMALL
卷 19, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202207554

关键词

artificial synapses; iono-electronics; mixed conductors; organic; polymers; transistors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the performance of semiconducting polymers in electrochemical and synaptic transistors by controlling the density of polar sidechains and hybridizing ion permeability and charge mobility. The results demonstrate efficient electrochemical signal transduction and reliable synaptic plasticity achieved through controlled ion insertion and retention. Furthermore, the newly designed polymers show unprecedented thermal tolerance, a key property in the manufacturing of organic electronics.
Iono-electronics, that is, transducing devices able to translate ionic injection into electrical output, continue to demand a variety of mixed ionic-electronic conductors (MIECs). Though polar sidechains are widely used in designing novel polymer MIECs, it remains unclear to chemists how much balance is needed between the two antagonistic modes of transport (ion permeability and electronic charge transport) to yield high-performance materials. Here, the impact of molecularly hybridizing ion permeability and charge mobility in semiconducting polymers on their performance in electrochemical and synaptic transistors is investigated. A series of diketopyrrolopyrrole (DPP)-based copolymers are employed to demonstrate the multifunctionality attained by controlling the density of polar sidechains along the backbone. Notably, efficient electrochemical signal transduction and reliable synaptic plasticity are demonstrated via controlled ion insertion and retention. The newly designed DPP-based copolymers further demonstrate unprecedented thermal tolerance among organic mixed ionic-electronic conductors, a key property in the manufacturing of organic electronics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据