4.8 Article

Robust Biomass-Derived Carbon Frameworks as High-Performance Anodes in Potassium-Ion Batteries

期刊

SMALL
卷 19, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202206588

关键词

anodes; carbon materials; high-rate; potassium-ion batteries

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study employs a structural engineering strategy to introduce anionic defects within carbon structures, aiming to enhance the kinetics of potassium-ion batteries (PIBs). The carbon framework provides a strong and stable structure, and further phosphorus doping modification improves the rate capability. The optimized electrode exhibits high capacity and enhanced rate performance, providing rational design guidance for carbon-based anodes in PIBs.
Potassium-ion batteries (PIBs) have become one of the promising candidates for electrochemical energy storage that can provide low-cost and high-performance advantages. The poor cyclability and rate capability of PIBs are due to the intensive structural change of electrode materials during battery operation. Carbon-based materials as anodes have been successfully commercialized in lithium- and sodium-ion batteries but is still struggling in potassium-ion battery field. This work conducts structural engineering strategy to induce anionic defects within the carbon structures to boost the kinetics of PIBs anodes. The carbon framework provides a strong and stable structure to accommodate the volume variation of materials during cycling, and the further phosphorus doping modification is shown to enhance the rate capability. This is found due to the change of the pore size distribution, electronic structures, and hence charge storage mechanism. The optimized electrode in this work shows a high capacity of 175 mAh g(-1) at a current density of 0.2 A g(-1) and the enhancement of rate performance as the PIB anode (60% capacity retention with the current density increase of 50 times). This work, therefore provides a rational design for guiding future research on carbon-based anodes for PIBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据