4.8 Article

Ultrahigh Detectivity Broad Spectrum UV Photodetector with Rapid Response Speed Based on p-β Ga2O3/n-GaN Heterojunction Fabricated by a Reversed Substitution Doping Method

期刊

SMALL
卷 19, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202206664

关键词

n-GaN; p-Ga2O3; p; n heterojunctions; reversed substitution doping; UV photodetectors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports an excellent broad-spectrum UV photodetector with a high detectivity. The device is based on a p-beta Ga2O3/n-GaN heterojunction and exhibits a continuous conduction band without a potential energy barrier, enabling efficient electron transport. The photodetector shows a high photoresponsivity and detectivity for different wavelengths ranging from 255 nm to 360 nm.
An excellent broad-spectrum (220-380 nm) UV photodetector, covering the UVA-UVC wavelength range, with an ultrahigh detectivity of approximate to 10(15) cm Hz(1/2) W-1, is reported. It is based on a p-beta Ga2O3/n-GaN heterojunction, in which p-beta Ga2O3 is synthesized by thermal oxidation of GaN and a heterostructure is constructed with the bottom n-GaN. XRD shows the oxide layer is (-201) preferred oriented beta-phase Ga2O3 films. SIMS and XPS indicate that the residual N atoms as dopants remain in beta Ga2O3. XPS also demonstrates that the Fermi level is 0.2 eV lower than the central level of the band gap, indicating that the dominant carriers are holes and the beta Ga2O3 is p-type conductive. Under a bias of -5 V, the photoresponsivity is 56 and 22 A W-1 for 255 and 360 nm, respectively. Correspondingly, the detectivities reach an ultrahigh value of 2.7 x 10(15) cm Hz(1/2) W-1 (255 nm) and 1.1 x 10(15) cm Hz(1/2) W-1 (360 nm). The high performance of this UV photodetector is attributed mainly to the continuous conduction band of the p-beta Ga2O3/n-GaN heterojunction without a potential energy barrier, which is more helpful for photogenerated electron transport from the space charge region to the n-type GaN layer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据