4.8 Article

In Situ Confining Citric Acid-Derived Carbon Dots for Full-Color Room-Temperature Phosphorescence

期刊

SMALL
卷 19, 期 31, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202205916

关键词

carbon dots; confining aggregation; encryption; full-color; room-temperature phosphorescence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a facile in situ confining strategy to prepare full-color phosphorescent carbon dots (CDs) through rapid microwave-assisted carbonization. The obtained CDs exhibit tunable phosphorescence wavelengths and alterable lifetimes by adjusting the mass ratio of the starting materials. Theoretical calculations and experimental results reveal that the formation of high-density ionic bonds and the evolution of the aggregation state of CDs play important roles in the phosphorescence characteristics.
Room-temperature phosphorescence has received much attention owing to its potential applications in information encryption and bioelectronics. However, the preparation of full-color single-component-derived phosphorescent materials remains a challenge. Herein, a facile in situ confining strategy is proposed to achieve full-color phosphorescent carbon dots (CDs) through rapid microwave-assisted carbonization of citric acid in NaOH. By tuning the mass ratio of citric acid and NaOH, the obtained CDs exhibit tunable phosphorescence wavelengths ranging from 483 to 635 nm and alterable lifetimes from 58 to 389 ms with a synthesis yield of up to 83.7% (>30 g per synthesis). Theoretical calculations and experimental results confirm that the formation of high-density ionic bonds between cations and CDs leads to efficient afterglow emission via the dissociation of CD arrangement, and the evolution of the aggregation state of CDs results in redshifted phosphorescence. These findings provide a strategy for the synthesis of new insights into achieving and manipulating room-temperature phosphorescent CDs, and prospect their applications in labeling and information encryption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据