4.6 Article

Structured Bayesian compressive sensing exploiting dirichlet process priors

期刊

SIGNAL PROCESSING
卷 201, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2022.108680

关键词

Compressive sensing; Structured priors; Dirichlet process; Cluster; Expectation propagation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a structured and clustered multi-task compressive sensing framework that exploits the inner sparse pattern and statistical dependence between tasks. By adopting a signal model with spike-and-slab priors and Dirichlet Process priors, the method achieves enhanced sparse reconstruction performance.
Conventional multi-task Bayesian compressive sensing methods, which compute the sparse representations of signals with a group sparse pattern, generally ignore the inner sparse structures of signals and/or their statistical correlations. These structures are naturally exhibited among clustered tasks with different sparse patterns. In this paper, a novel structured and clustered multi-task compressive sensing framework based on a hierarchical Bayesian model is proposed to exploit the inner sparse pattern and the statistical dependence between tasks. This is achieved by adopting a signal model that exploits the spike-and-slab priors and the Dirichlet Process priors. The former encode sparse patterns of the signals and are further generalized by imposing the Gaussian process for modeling inner structures. The Dirichlet Process priors, on the other hand, imposed on the support reveal the clustering mechanisms among tasks. In so doing, these priors provide a new means to simultaneously infer the clusters and perform compressive sensing inversion, yielding enhanced sparse reconstruction performance. A new inference scheme based on expectation propagation is derived to approximate the posterior distribution for simplifying the computation and deriving analytical expression. Experimental results verify the performance superiorities of the proposed algorithm over existing state-of-the-art methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据